finance property

The Difference Of Negative Gearing, Neutral Gearing And Positive Gearing?

You frequently hear phrases like "negative gearing," "positive gearing," and "neutral gearing," but I believe that a lot of people are confused about what each of this terminology actually means. I will provide an explanation of what those terms represent, as well as a synopsis of the reasons why some investors seek to purchase homes that have a negative gear ratio.

Despite the notoriously complicated nature of Australia's tax system, it is crucial for real estate investors in the country to have a solid understanding of the differences between negative gearing, neutral gearing, and positive gearing. Because the manner in which a property is geared has such a large influence on the return on investment that an investor receives, it is of the utmost significance to adopt the optimal strategy.

First, let's define what we mean when we talk about gearing: When discussing a rental property or another type of investment, the term "gearing" is used to refer to the total amount of borrowing and interest deductions that are associated with the investment.

Gearing is a term that refers to borrowing money in order to make an investment, and it is very frequently brought up in conversations about investment properties. There are three different kinds of gearing: positive, neutral, and negative. Each one is determined by the income that is received from an investment.

If the property is vacant and available for rent, you may be eligible to deduct the interest part of your loan repayments as an expense under current Australian tax rules. Additionally, you may be able to deduct certain other costs as well. One of the most important benefits of negative gearing is that the loss incurred by the property owner can be credited against other income obtained, such as wages, lowering your taxable income and thus the amount of tax payable.

Would you like to speak to a specialist? Book a complimentary discovery session by calling: (03)999 81940 or emailing

The cost of owning the property is being supported not only by your renter in the form of rents paid, but also by the Australian Tax Office in the form of tax savings, and by your other excess cash flow, such as your savings and other forms of income. In some cases, the savings made from tax deductions might even surpass the losses realised from the property. The net effect is that the cost of owning the property is being covered by your tenant in the form of rents paid, but also by the Australian Tax Office in the form

The surplus income generated by positively geared properties can be allocated to other uses and other investments, or it can simply be held aside to meet any future increases in expenditures or loan repayments.

It is a well-established practice for higher taxpayers to look for an investment property that has negative equity in order to maximize the amount of tax return they receive. They are looking for a rise in the long-term capital growth of the property at the same time, which is something they think will happen.

Property investors who are getting closer to retirement or who fall into a lower income band may choose positively geared assets because they want to maximise the amount of money they can potentially make from their investments. In other words, they want to maximise the amount of money they can potentially make from their investments.

The use of gearing has the possibility of helping to increase the return on investment (ROI), but it also has the possibility of magnifying losses. As a consequence of this, gearing requires thorough consideration as well as the assistance of a trained specialist prior to the making of any decisions.

The following essay does an excellent job of explaining the concept of positive gearing in considerable detail. In addition, we will go through the definitions of negative gearing, positive cash flow, and neutral cash flow.

Investing in different types of real estate can provide a wide range of rewards, but it also presents the possibility of a number of risks. However, first things first: you need to have a strong awareness of the definitions of the many types of investment properties. All of these ideas pertain to the manner in which a property continuously affects the flow of cash that you have coming in and going out of your business.

The Meaning Behind the Terms "Negative," "Positive," and "Neutral" Gearing

Simply defined, negative gearing denotes the fact that an investment asset incurs more exceptional expenses than the revenue it generates, whilst positive gearing denotes the fact that the income generated by the investment is more than the costs associated with it. The term "neutral gearing" refers to the situation in which a person's income and expenses are equal to one another. If an investment asset has a negative gearing ratio, then an investor may be eligible to reduce the amount of taxable income that they report by the amount of losses that were sustained while holding the support for the investment. This is done by deducting the losses from the total amount of income that was earned. The kinds of expenses that could be claimed to lower revenue and, as a result, taxable income need to have a direct connection to the acquisition and maintenance of an asset that generates income. Loan interest, depreciation, council rates, managing agent fees, maintenance charges, and, if applicable, strata fees are the most frequent types of tax deductions that are available to real estate investors.

Positive Gearing

The term "positive gearing" refers to a situation in which the annual rental revenue from a property is higher than the annual loan repayments and other costs associated with the property. In this scenario, you are making more money from your property; nevertheless, this income is taxable and, as a result, you are required to report it when it comes time to file your taxes.

Those who advocate for this method of investing contend that the profits generated might afterwards be put to use to assist in funding further investment properties. When there are strong rental returns, positive gearing can be highly favourable for investors. This is especially the case in circumstances when there are multiple rental units.

When an investment generates gross income that is greater than the costs associated with owning and managing the acquisition, including the cost of interest paid on any borrowings, the investor is said to have positive gearing. This is because the investor's gross income exceeds the costs associated with owning and managing the acquisition (payments reducing the principal component of borrowings is not included as a cost). A positive cash flow is produced by the investment both before and after taking into account the impact of taxes on the cash that is generated as a result of the investment.

You have positive gearing, which is also just referred to as "gearing," when the total amount of the gross income you receive from your investment property (or any investment, for that matter) is greater than the total amount of the deductions and expenses. This is true regardless of the type of investment. If you utilise positive gearing, you may find yourself in a position where you are compelled to pay income tax on the money that is left over after taxes have been deducted.

If you own this kind of property, keep in mind that if you ever decide to sell it, you will also be subject to paying capital gains tax on the profit you make from the sale.

Let's say you've worked hard and saved enough money to buy a house (it doesn't really matter how much it cost you). It brings in a rental revenue of $1,000 per month, while the costs of managing and maintaining the property add up to $800 per month. If the amount of annual rental income generated by the property is greater than the amount of annual costs connected with holding the property, then the property can be deemed to be profitable. If you take use of all of the deductions that are available to you, such as depreciation, you will increase the likelihood that you will be able to lower the amount of tax that you are required to pay on the profit that you generate.

Despite the fact that you have a remaining cash balance of more than $200 (before taxes), you have an additional cash balance of more than $100 after paying taxes at the end of each month (maximum tax rate is 45 percent not including Medicare levy or surcharge).

According to Haberfield, a property is said to be in a favourable gearing position when the rental income from the property is more than the authorised expenses for the property, which results in the taxpayer having income that is subject to taxation.

Negative Gearing

If the income that your rental property earns from tenants is less than the costs that are associated with keeping it up and running, then your rental property is said to be in a negative gearing position. Properties that have a negative gear ratio are often where the bulk of investors get their start, and this is mostly because of the enormous tax advantages that these kinds of investments provide.

When an investor borrows money in order to invest, they are engaging in the practice of negative gearing, which is a sort of financial leverage. Despite this, the investment generates a gross income that is not sufficient to cover the costs of holding and administering the investment. These costs include the interest that is charged on any borrowings. It should be noted that the investment results in a loss of cash.

Let's imagine you're the proud owner of a home (the price tag doesn't really important). However, let's imagine that it costs you $1,200 per month in property expenses despite the fact that it brings in $1,000 every month in rental income (the same as the previous illustration).

In this hypothetical situation, you would end each month with a negative balance of two hundred dollars. This suggests that in order to "pay off" this "debt," you will need to come up with $200 from another source, most likely the money you obtain from the job that you already have. This "debt" was incurred because of the purchase of a vehicle.

You would have lost money before taxes (in the amount of $200), and you would have lost money after taxes (in the range of roughly $200 to $110, depending on your tax rate). If there had been no depreciation (see an explanation of depreciation), you would have lost money before taxes (in the amount of $200), and you would have lost money after taxes (in the amount of $200).

Although many individuals go into real estate investing with the assumption that their investment will give them with an immediate source of income, this is not always the case. Although many people get into real estate investing with the hope that their investment will provide them with an immediate stream of income, this is not always the

It is possible for an investment property to have a positive gearing, a neutral gearing, or a negative gearing, depending on the net income that is received from the property.

If an investor is getting a better rental return than the outgoing expenses, then the property will have positive cash flow, and the owner will be obligated to pay taxes on the revenue that was made from renting out the property.

On the other hand, a negatively geared property is one that has rental income that is lower than the entire outlay expenses, which also include deductible losses. This type of property is called "negatively geared." As a direct consequence of this, the cash flow that the real estate investor anticipated receiving from their investment has not materialised.

This monetary loss can be used to offset any income that is received, such as a wage, and as a consequence, an investor who owns a negatively geared property will be required to pay less tax to the ATO on an annual basis. This is because the ATO considers the property to be in a loss position.

As a consequence of this, making use of the tax system in order to aid in offsetting the loss that was sustained as a result of an investment property is effectively being done here.

For many people, this is a short-term solution that can be utilised until a particular piece of investment property can start generating a positive income flow on its own.

Despite this, a large number of Australian investors prefer to use this strategy, and some even choose to keep their portfolios negatively geared as part of a longer-term strategy. The reason for this preference lies in the fact that negative gearing can help investors generate higher returns over the longer term. When making any choice that has to do with an investment property, investors need to consider the perks and drawbacks of the strategy in light of the specific financial goals they have established for themselves as investors. This is also true for any decision that has to do with an investment property.

Negatively geared properties have the potential to generate losses for their owners, but such losses can be deducted against other types of income and used to lower overall taxable income. There is also the possibility of making long-term gains through the process of capital appreciation, which is another advantage of using negative gearing. At this point, the value of your property will have increased more significantly than the costs associated with the project.

When you borrow money to pay for an investment and the value of the interest on your loan is larger than the income you've gotten from your investment, you are said to be "negatively gearing" your investment. This phenomenon is described by the term "negative gearing." When your annual rental income is less than the interest costs on your mortgage plus all of the expenses associated with your property, we refer to an investment property as being "negatively geared." To put it another way, a property is considered to be "negatively geared" when it has a "negative gearing ratio" (i.e. resulting in a net loss).

When you read or hear about negative gearing in this day and age, the vast majority of the time, it is in connection with investment properties. Negative gearing losses on real estate investments are tax deductible in Australia, making it one of the very few countries in which this is the case.

However, the majority of investors chose a property that has a negative gearing with the idea that it will eventually become neutral or positively geared throughout the duration of their investment in the property.

According to Haberfield, if a property is negatively geared, it means that the deductions that can be claimed for the property exceed the rental income, which results in a tax loss on the property. In other words, the rental income is lower than the deductions that can be claimed for the property. In other words, the income from the rental property is not sufficient to cover the expenses that might be deducted for the property.

Neutral Gearing

When the amount of money made from a piece of real estate is equal to the amount of money borrowed for the property as well as the costs of maintaining it, we say that the property has neutral gearing. In this circumstance, the income is liable to be taxed, but the interest and other charges involved with borrowing money can be deducted from the taxpayer's overall taxable income.

You probably already have a good understanding of what is meant by the term "neutral gearing," which refers to a situation in which the costs of an investment and the income that it creates are equivalent to one another. When anything like this takes place, the taxes that are paid do not result in either a benefit or a disadvantage of any kind.

A situation is said to have "neutral gearing" when the total amount of income generated by an investment property is equivalent to the total amount of expenses associated with that investment property. This situation is referred to by the term "neutral gearing." Repayments on a mortgage, the cost of repairs and upkeep, property management fees, and any other reoccurring or one-time charges linked with the ownership of an investment property are examples of the types of expenses that fall under this category.

She says that "neutral gearing" occurs when a taxpayer's income and spending remain unchanged, which shows that there is no influence on the taxpayer's revenue. In other words, there is no change.

The vast majority of individuals who discuss neutral cash flow do not specify whether or whether the figure in question is derived prior to or after to the application of taxes when they discuss it. The situation in which a property exactly balances its income and expenses is highly unusual. On the other hand, many people will refer to a piece of real estate as "neutral," regardless of whether the revenue or loss is large or not. This is because many people believe that real estate is always a good investment. (To give you an example, a profit of $7.85 on a property with a value of $500,000 would be considered insignificant, and the majority of people would probably refer to this kind of investment as having neutral cash flow.)

A piece of real estate is considered to have a neutral cash flow if, over the course of a year, it does not generate a profit or a loss. This is because the revenue from the rental of the property more than compensates for the loss. If rents keep going up and interest rates keep going down, the property has a good chance of being one that generates positive cash flow. This is one of my goals for the investment, and I have high hopes that it is now earning capital gains.

Investors are provided with a trustworthy option in neutral gearing due to the fact that there are very few to no costs related with the upkeep of the property. However, there is still the possibility of making a profit in the form of appreciation of the capital invested.

You should keep in mind that it is always a good idea to talk to an accountant or a financial advisor regarding the gearing strategy that is most suitable to your financial circumstances in order to ensure that you are making the most informed decision possible. Discussing the gearing strategy in question with either of these professionals is a good way to ensure that you are making the most informed decision possible. Those investors who wish to develop a varied real estate portfolio should investigate the possibility of purchasing residences that have a cash flow that is neither positive nor negative. They are confident that within the first few years of ownership, the properties will cover their expenses, and that once the mortgages are paid off, they will be able to subsist solely on the income from the rental properties. They are also confident that the properties will cover their expenses within the first few years of ownership. Because of this, they are willing to give up some of the gain that their investment would have experienced otherwise.

If this describes you in any way, you should begin your search for a new place to live as soon as humanly possible. We have been presented with a chance that comes around just once in a person's lifetime as a direct result of the fact that interest rates are currently at their lowest point in the last forty years.

Why Would You Use Negative Gear?

According to Haberfield, "the benefit of negative gearing is that it causes a tax loss, which can be offset against a taxpayer's other income, in order to reduce the taxpayer's taxable income and, as a result, the amount of tax paid."

"However, because there is a significant amount of debt secured against the property, the drawback is that the income that is obtained from the rent will not be sufficient to cover the expenses and any main loan repayments; therefore, the taxpayer will be required to fund the difference," she continues.

According to Haberfield, the primary reason why investors purchase negatively geared houses is for the tax benefits.

There are also non-cash expenses that can be deducted from the value of a rental property, such as depreciation on fixtures and fittings and building write-offs, which allow a taxpayer to deduct up to 2.5% of the property's real construction costs each year and therefore raise the tax loss without increasing cash outflows.

"Depending on how much may be claimed for these new deductions, the taxpayer might not be required to fund too much of the tax loss out of their financial reserves. Therefore, they can reduce their tax burden without suffering a reduction in their cash flow, she explains.

Why Should We Use Positive Gear?

"The benefit of using positive gearing is that it results in a positive cash flow for the taxpayer since they end up collecting more money than they have to pay out.

"On the other hand, there will be an additional tax that needs to be paid on the profit," argues Haberfield.

Additionally, although it will be less than for negative gearing, a cash shortage may still exist based on loan principal repayments.

Why Neutral Gear?

The beautiful thing about having a property with neutral cash flow is that the property will not cost you anything to own because the amount of money coming in from rent will be equal to the amount of money leaving the property. In fact, if you wait long enough and your rentals keep increasing at a rate greater than your expenses do, you will ultimately own a property where your tenant covers all of your costs and you still have some money left over. Positive cash flow is the term used to describe this phenomenon.

The best way to achieve your goal of owning many homes is to invest in cash-flowing assets that generate neutral or positive overall returns. When you purchase a home with a negative cash flow, it indicates you will need to use personal funds to help pay the mortgage or other expenses related to the property. The amount of money you can put into your pockets to help with the rent has a cap because they are not bottomless pits. (The bank will typically be the one to set these limits.)

Theoretically, you can purchase an infinite number of properties with neutral cash flow because doing so doesn't cost you anything. However, many factors than only your cash flow scenario come into play when applying for a bank loan. They will also take into account your equity status, which is the proportion of the property's value that you possess to its value that you owe.

Even though the cash flow from properties with neutral cash flow may appear to be adequate on paper, the bank will also account for vacancies, rising costs, and unforeseen expenses. This will restrict your purchasing power. On the other side, if you have a reliable source of income, a large amount of equity in your home, and a solid job, you may buy a lot of properties without it having any impact on your cash flow.

Would you like to speak to a specialist? Book a complimentary discovery session by calling: (03)999 81940 or emailing

Is it possible for a negative property to change to a positive one or vice versa?

As was mentioned above, if a property is held for an extended period of time as an investment, it has the potential to evolve into a positively geared property. Over the course of time, rentals will go up, interest rates might go down, and/or you might pay some or all of the principle off (thereby reducing or cutting your payments).

At some point in the future, the income from the rental of the property will either equal or exceed the costs of maintaining it, resulting in a situation that is neutral or positive. This is typically the long-term approach that people who use negative gearing have, as they view it as a retirement plan — an asset that will provide them with cash flow when they are retired.

The unfortunate reality is that the inverse is equally true. In the case of a shift in the rental market and an increase in interest rates, a property that was previously positively geared may turn negative in the future. Both of these scenarios typically need to be fairly severe for a property to fall into the red; it is more likely that your profit will drop as opposed to disappearing entirely. Obviously, this is hardly the best possible scenario either.

Investors, regardless of whether they have a positive or negative geared portfolio, are strongly encouraged to make contingency plans in the event that they are confronted with a scenario that requires them to implement those plans. You will be in an excellent position to weather the storm of challenging market conditions if you take some basic steps to prepare, such as setting aside money for unexpected expenses.

Should I put money into both positively and negatively appraised properties?

Diversification of holdings is essential for lowering overall portfolio risk. Many investors have found that having a mix of properties that generate positive and negative cash flow allows them to have exposure to a wider range of markets while also ensuring that they do not run into any cash flow issues. An optimal overall strategy for obtaining growth as well as passive income is to make investments in well-located negative and high-returning positive properties. This will allow you to have the best of both worlds.

Scroll to Top